|
|
Post by shawn on Nov 7, 2009 0:05:30 GMT -5
Hello every one, I just thought i would post a thread for everyone to be able to chat about the movies we have made.
1. Legends of Gretchen's Lock
2. Lost Tapes
3. Esther Hale
4. Gretchen
If you have not seen these movies please check them out in out online store and let us know what you thought of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anon on Nov 20, 2009 23:04:11 GMT -5
The photo taken from inside the car when you heard a noise is not a ghost, its the seat belt where its mounted to the car. Trust me I know photos
|
|
|
|
Post by shawn on Nov 21, 2009 13:52:32 GMT -5
Anon, You should join our forum and register a name on here for free. A seat belt? That is a first and respectfully you are not correct here. Look at the photo below. Also, have you seen the actual video of this? This picture is only a still taken from the actual video. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Anon on Nov 21, 2009 14:45:20 GMT -5
I see it plain as day, its a seat belt. I can appreciate your efforts but you should be very critical of what you present as evidence. Its photos like yours that people that are inexperienced in spirit photography are quick to believe its real due to matrixing. It does look like a face, if thats what your looking for. But since it is obviously an over the shoulder picture its logical to think its a seat belt, then it does look like a seat belt and not a face.
|
|
|
|
Post by shawn on Nov 21, 2009 14:53:19 GMT -5
Respectfully your observation makes no sense to me. Can you please explain why you feel this is a seatbelt in a bit more detail? In the actual video this image comes rushing up to the car window, it knocks on the car and then steps back. Once it steps back you can see an outline of a glowing body. I understand you trying to present your facts but without a further explanation your critique dont add up. Thanks again for the comment though.
|
|
|
|
Post by environmentalgrl on Nov 21, 2009 15:05:56 GMT -5
I have seen the movie and that is definately not a seatbelt. Before you start critizing the movie maybe you should see it first? Just like shawn said whatever that is comes rushing up to the window and then when a noise is heard it rushes away from the window, then you can clearly see a glowing outline of a body standing outside the car then it moves over to the shawn's window. That to me is clear evidence that something is out there and just watching that part of the movie brought chills down my spine, it was creepy as hell.
On another note, i seen all 4 movies and they are all great. For a bunch of locals to put a movie together it was very entertaining and awesome. Look forward to seeing more from you guys, keep up the great work. You all definately proved that something is out there at Gretchen's Lock.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anon on Nov 21, 2009 20:15:40 GMT -5
I saw the video and while I dont doubt what you heard and what happened but I bet if you tried to recreate this shot, same lighting, angle and camera, you would get the same results. You always should try to debunk so it makes your evidence even more credible. Also enviro girl, what are you talking about yourself in the 3rd person since you were a part of these movies?
|
|
|
|
Post by environmentalgrl on Nov 21, 2009 22:44:17 GMT -5
For one yes i am Kristina and i was not talking in the third person. I can say whatever i want to say. I experienced everything that happened and if you seen the movie then you would hear right after we explain the face in the window that shawn said the next day we tried to recreate that and we could not. Second of all we always try to debunk what we find, our evidence is credible, go out yourself and try to get what we got, instead of coming into our forum and belittling us. Also how would you know you get the same results, show us how you recreate the shot and prove to me that you can, and you will find out that you cant. You make no sense what so ever!
|
|
|
|
Post by shaniedip on Nov 22, 2009 0:39:59 GMT -5
I am anon, You have to try to debunk in the same conditions. If it was dark outside then recreate in the dark not daylight, recreate the exact same conditions, thats all im saying. Im not trying to belittle anyone. Your attitude shows that you are new to this field. Most seasoned investigators accept all views even if they dont agree with them. If you want to be taken seriously by other paranormal investigators you have to put your evidence out there and take the criticism and get over being so defensive unless you dont care.I would love to recreate this shot and in fact I may do it to the best of my ability but if something looks like a seat belt over someones shoulder, then I call it a seat belt.
|
|
|
|
Post by environmentalgrl on Nov 22, 2009 15:36:48 GMT -5
well that is your opinion and its cool what you think because we have a haters club and i was there i experienced everything and we did try to recreate what happened like i said and could not get the same results. We did put our evidence out there and we have gotten more applause then hatred. The pros of responses we get definately out way the cons. No it does not bug me what people say frankly i dont care, i got what i got, i saw what i saw and that is all. If you choose to not believe it then that is your choice, that is what paranormal is all about you will constantly be questioned over what you do and all i have to say is do it yourself and experience it yourself that is the only way to get respect in this field. You believe what you want, i disagree with you.
|
|
